School textbooks teach without much explanation of why they teach. The current ideas are cut off from the history behind them. Context turns what you read into more meaningful information, and that is what Mitch Stokes has done with Isaac Newton. He walks you through the day-to-day life of a great man with the help of letters and comments from those who knew him.
Stokes has managed to impress me with how well he portrays the intellect of Isaac Newton. His book contains enough references to keep me busy with research for the next few years while he simplifies the details so that they can be understood by a casual reader.
If not for the need of sleep, I would have read all 168 pages in one sitting. In accordance with reality, I had to read it in two sittings. The book gave several occasions to laugh at the antics of the characters on the pages, and they remind me very much of the eccentricities of some of my friends. On a couple of occasions it turned out that I agreed more with Newtonâs opponents than with him, but it was very interesting to see the sorts of exchanges that took place.
I did receive this book free from Thomas Nelson Publishers for review purposes. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own and I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commissionâs rules and regulations. Go get your own opinions.
Comments
Submitted by
netwiz on
Just curious what one example is of an opposing view you too from Isaac Newton? I’m also vaguely worried that I’m being too consistent about posting comments on your blog, but I should be over that by tomorrow.
Submitted by
Chris on
I will get back to your other comments soon—just can’t spend 24/7 replying to everyone. ^_^
The publishing company asked for a short review so this book did not get the depth that I normally try to give. Isaac Newton did not believe in the trinity. He argued against gravity as the cause of a planet’s elliptical orbit around the sun (or the moon around the earth) for a long while. He disliked the time that it took to explain his knowledge to other people.
I am still in awe. Among other things, he solved a math problem in 12 hours that other leading mathematical minds of his day required more than two months to solve.
Submitted by
netwiz on
Thanks for the additional details; those whet my appetite to read the book.
I proved I wasn’t hopeless on the reply-to-everything. I read several other entries last night without uncontrolled use of the comment button and I think I even let one of your comments have the last word this morning.
Add new comment
Chris is an ideologue who acknowledges Murphy’s existence.
Comments
Submitted by netwiz on
Just curious what one example is of an opposing view you too from Isaac Newton? I’m also vaguely worried that I’m being too consistent about posting comments on your blog, but I should be over that by tomorrow.
Submitted by Chris on
I will get back to your other comments soon—just can’t spend 24/7 replying to everyone. ^_^
The publishing company asked for a short review so this book did not get the depth that I normally try to give. Isaac Newton did not believe in the trinity. He argued against gravity as the cause of a planet’s elliptical orbit around the sun (or the moon around the earth) for a long while. He disliked the time that it took to explain his knowledge to other people.
I am still in awe. Among other things, he solved a math problem in 12 hours that other leading mathematical minds of his day required more than two months to solve.
Submitted by netwiz on
Thanks for the additional details; those whet my appetite to read the book.
I proved I wasn’t hopeless on the reply-to-everything. I read several other entries last night without uncontrolled use of the comment button and I think I even let one of your comments have the last word this morning.