Just to offer a warning, this post may be uncomfortable to read.
A friend pointed out an old news story that has made my blood boil. ABC’s 20/20 reported on the events that transpired one evening during the dinner rush at a McDonalds in Kentucky. Someone called and claimed to be a police officer who had the store manager on the phone. It was claimed that 18-yo Ogborn had stolen a purse from a little girl:
Ogborn was told to empty her pockets and surrender her car keys and cell phone, which she did. Then the caller demanded that Summers [the assistant manager on duty] have Ogborn remove her clothes â even her underwear â leaving her with just a small, dirty apron to cover her naked body.
Summers says she never second-guessed what she was being asked to do, as she firmly believed the person she was talking to was a police officer. Ogborn says she trusted her manager to do what was right.
Because it was so busy, the “police officer” told the manager to call her fiance in to watch Ogborn. When he arrived:
Nix, a 43-year-old exterminator, began following the caller’s commands, ordering Ogborn to drop her apron, bend over and stand on a chair.
This was the beginning of two hours of torment that involved Ogborn being struck and having to perform sexual acts. McDonalds was sued—read the full article for more details, I’m skipping to the end—and in defense was this:
In one of the most explosive moments from the trial, a psychologist hired by McDonald’s testified that Ogborn had “grown in some way” from the horrific incident. Forensic psychologist Alan Friedman, who was paid more than $50,000 by the fast food company, acknowledged that Ogden experienced post-traumatic stress, but asserted that she has grown from the experience and is more assertive and self-reliant than she was before the 3½-hour humiliating ordeal.
Why are you still reading this? Go out and get raped. It will be a growing experience for you.
What happened to the caller, you ask? They found him by tracing phone cards and surveillance videos, but…
In the end, there apparently wasn’t enough evidence to convince the jury. After two hours of deliberations, Stewart was found not guilty on all charges.
The article has an analysis of why this could be made to happen. Fast food chains try to have everything “by the book” and the moment that you introduce someone into a unique situation, they are at a loss for what to do.
If you want to see this happen sometime, walk through the drive thru after one of the chains has closed the dining room area for the night. Try to convince them to sell you food. The employees quite literally freak out (I walk late at night and sometimes get hungry).
The friend who pointed this article out was trying to make the point that wives and daughters should not be allowed to work outside the home. I have to disagree. In the article was an example of a strip search ordered on a male employee by his female boss. Incidentally, Summers said she trusted her fiance. She has since broken off the engagement. This was not a gender-specific problem but nobody had the backbone to hang up on the caller.
There is nothing wrong with questioning authority. Some times and places require you to blindly obey someone who has already proven themselves. Try not to let others decide when those times are.
Comments
Submitted by Sarah on
Chris, this is simply UNBELIEVABLE. You have to be dumb not to question that.
And even if a real police offer command that, there’s a time to say no. OMG.
And speaking of stupidity, my mom called the bank yesterday and asked about a CD rate. Then Mom said, “So in other words that’s 140+ on $10,000 a year” The person, in the CD department, had no idea.
Submitted by Chris on
[quote=Sarah]Chris, this is simply UNBELIEVABLE. You have to be dumb not to question that.
Some people seem to be… They had at least 5 people who listened to the caller. 2-3 of them refused to do what he asked, but did not hang up on him.
[quote=Sarah]And speaking of stupidity, my mom called the bank yesterday and asked about a CD rate. Then Mom said, “So in other words that’s 140+ on $10,000 a year” The person, in the CD department, had no idea.
So… do you want a job at the bank? ^_^
Submitted by netwiz on
I tend to think that “not thinking” is the result and not the cause. Because life is easy (society keeps people alive even when they’re repeatedly stupid), we have more and more people that don’t want to exert much effort in life. Centuries past would kill off people that were lazy, stupid, non-relational, etc. I do believe that survival of the fittest occurs—I don’t believe that it should be artificially pursued or anything but I think we should give some thought to what we should do when we’re allowing incompetence to live a full life…and produce more lives.
This also goes for medical problems…we’re going to have more and more and more of them and we’re going to have to figure out how to keep advancing in medical technology until we can just afford to keep anyone alive no matter how severely lacking their bodies are in ability to live. Take the simple example of infertility: I firmly believe a big reason its increasing is because we keep making marginally fertile people able to have offspring that are then more likely to be infertile. I feel like I’ve gotten into this genetic mutation argument here already, so tell me if I have.