It is constantly a surprise to me how many parallels there were in Rome to our culture today. We think that technology has changed everything and yet it really has not. Men and women are still human and we have not succeeded in changing that.
Here is a brief quote from a book called Roman Sexualities by Judith Hallett and Marilyn Skinner (paperback, page 81):
Actors and acresses were regularly assumed to be prostitutes. We should not deduce that this was because many actors and actresses sold their sexual services. Rather, the way in which they made their living, exposing themselves to public view, their bodies objects of fascination and desire, was perceived to be analogous to the way in which prostitutes made their living. Like prostitutes, their bodies had to please—as did those of the gladiators. The very sight of these performers was thought to produce sexual desire [example censored].
Is this so different from our culture? There sure are a lot of gasps from women when certain guys remove their shirts on the big screen. Popular clothing styles imitate the attempt to please with our bodies. Is nothing else important?
Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that we should try to be ugly, but there is more to life and we are emphasizing something that disappears so quickly.
Comments
Submitted by
Christy on
Was that one of the books I gave you? If so, you will find many many many more examples that correlate to our modern culture in a disturbing way.
Submitted by
Chris on
No, I haven’t even gotten to Tacitus yet but I have a feeling that he is going to talk about the daughter of Augustus… and many other disturbing things (as you indicated).
I found this while attempting a narrow study of Gaia Afrenia (also known as Gafrenia). You may remember the question that I posed about women and their legal ability to speak in an assembly. It seems that she had a bad effect on womens’ rights to do that in the Roman empire.
In this research, I did learn a bit about the Roman view of what makes a “man” vs. a “woman.” It explains I Corinthians 6:9 better.
Submitted by
Christy on
Now you’ve really got me interested. I don’t think we ever studied Gaia Afrenia in the “Women of Ancient Greece and Rome” class or “Roman Empire”.
Submitted by
Chris on
All that I have found about her so far is third, fourth, etc. sources… nothing primary.
Until I can verify more, I’d rather not talk about it too much here. Want to ask next time I see you?
Add new comment
It was such a small town that we didn’t even have a village idiot. We had to take turns.
Comments
Submitted by Christy on
Was that one of the books I gave you? If so, you will find many many many more examples that correlate to our modern culture in a disturbing way.
Submitted by Chris on
No, I haven’t even gotten to Tacitus yet but I have a feeling that he is going to talk about the daughter of Augustus… and many other disturbing things (as you indicated).
I found this while attempting a narrow study of Gaia Afrenia (also known as Gafrenia). You may remember the question that I posed about women and their legal ability to speak in an assembly. It seems that she had a bad effect on womens’ rights to do that in the Roman empire.
In this research, I did learn a bit about the Roman view of what makes a “man” vs. a “woman.” It explains I Corinthians 6:9 better.
Submitted by Christy on
Now you’ve really got me interested. I don’t think we ever studied Gaia Afrenia in the “Women of Ancient Greece and Rome” class or “Roman Empire”.
Submitted by Chris on
All that I have found about her so far is third, fourth, etc. sources… nothing primary.
Until I can verify more, I’d rather not talk about it too much here. Want to ask next time I see you?